| First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 2189 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
RK. Jain vs Nodal COIO
[LexDoc Id : 483593]
|
CIC |
2013 |
R.K. Jain vs Nodal CPIO, CIC
[LexDoc Id : 471611]
|
CIC |
2013 |
Business Process Outsourcing India (P) Ltd. vs CC and Service Tax
[LexDoc Id : 461849]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2013 |
Rusapi Containers vs Commissioner
[LexDoc Id : 462239]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2013 |
Visaka Industries Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 472596]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2013 |
Standard Batteries Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 470565]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2013 |
Gobind Castings (P) Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 471609]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2013 |
Abdul Karimhaji Umarbhai Rasulbhai vs State of Gujarat
[LexDoc Id : 458918]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2013 |
Madhya Bharat Papers Ltd. vs CCE and C
[LexDoc Id : 470567]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2013 |
Sam Turbo Industries Ltd. vs CC, CE and Service Tax
[LexDoc Id : 467054]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2013 |
CCE vs CESTAT and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 465887]
|
HC (Madras) |
2013 |
Siemens Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 465870]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2013 |
CCE vs Alpha Carbonless Paper Mfg. Co. (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 467056]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2013 |
Kalai Magal Alloys Steel (P) Ltd. vs CESTAT Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 465886]
|
HC (Madras) |
2013 |
A Infrastructure Ltd. vs CTO
[LexDoc Id : 461287]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2013 |
Dr. Hedgewar Seva Samiti vs Purushottam Ramdas Joshi and State of Maharashtra
[LexDoc Id : 459914]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Suraj Prakash vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 471169]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2013 |
CCE vs Grand Card Industries
[LexDoc Id : 467981]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2013 |
Distant Horizon Orchard (P) Ltd. vs CCE and Ors.
Direction to pre-deposit: Non-consideration of existence of fraud, misrepresentation, etc. to invoke extended period-Justification of such invocation or of imposition of 100 percent penalty not considered, Pre-deposit directed without disclosing reasons, Impugned orders set aside-In an appeal against pre-deposit, the high court noted that appellate commissioner had cursorily considered the merits of the case. Whether there was [LexDoc Id : 472044]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2013 |
CCE vs Soundararaja Mills Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 470686]
|
HC (Madras) |
2013 |
Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. vs CST and ors.
[LexDoc Id : 462240]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2013 |
Yogendra Singh Tomar vs Bar Council for Uttarakhand and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 454438]
|
SC |
2013 |
UOI and Ors. vs Maharaja Shree Umaid Mills
Modvat credit: Effect of enactment of s.112 of Finance Act 2000-S.112 not having retrospective effect, Interest payable on wrongful availment of credit-Modvat credit of the duty paid on the use of high speed diesel oil was withdrawn by Notification issued on 16 March 1995 as well as a Trade Notice dat [LexDoc Id : 454436]
|
SC |
2013 |
Mumbai Cricket Association, Ravi Sawant, P.V. Shetty and Nitin Dalal vs Gopinath Munde, Sanjeev M. Gorwadkar, C.T. Shanghvi and Sharad Pawar
[LexDoc Id : 460297]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Dalmia Cement Bharat Ltd. vs State of Tamil Nadu and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 454371]
|
SC |
2013 |
| |
| First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
